The key advantage of CI is the automation of testing. I’ve encountered plenty of projects that were rewritten so many times they became nearly unreadable:
- The code became harder and harder to understand. Every new change required engineers to spend more time figuring out the logic.
- Fixing one bug often broke something that had previously worked.
- Each new engineer wrote in their own style, which made the code even less readable. Internal coding guidelines existed, but they were rarely followed.
- The code often had obvious errors, but didn’t break only because of some side effects.
In general, this is completely normal. People get tired. People won’t manually check every three-line change across fifty complex tests. We’re simply not built for monotonous, repetitive work that requires constant focus.
These kinds of problems are perfectly solved by automatic control and testing in a unified CI pipeline.
You wrote some code but ignored PEP8 standards on indentation, spaces, or variable naming? Automated linters will check it and flag any issues before your code is merged into the main branch.
Discovered a critical vulnerability in one of the hundreds of packages in your project? You’ll get a full report of the issue with links to the specific CVEs and recommendations on how to fix them. Vulnerable code won’t make it into the main branch or to your clients.
One of the developers added a secret password directly into the code? A new feature breaks one of the hundreds of already functioning ones? All of this gets detected automatically every time any change, no matter how small, is added. With CI, you can be sure that the application you deliver to your clients will always meet at least the minimum standards you’ve defined in the CI pipeline.